UK Premier needs to rethink his strategy and agenda
The British Government’s plan to renegotiate the terms of its EU membership are inopportune as the June summit underlined by giving it 5 minutes “discussion”. The EU is tackling the possibility of Greece leaving the euro and Ukraine going bankrupt while simultaneously being dismantled by force by Russia.
Now, the EU has also to address itself to a, yet to be revealed in all its detail, British renegotiation agenda. This agenda will most likely be shaped around David Cameron’s assessment of what concessions he has a good chance of getting.
What he gets will probably not satisfy the 100 or so Tory MPs who simply want the UK to leave the EU. And with a majority of only 12, David Cameron cannot ignore them. Other EU leaders will have to judge how close they should go to their own bottom line – just to satisfy opinion in a country which may leave the EU anyway.
Treaty logjam already
Cameron’s demands are already very explicit and clear on one issue…the rights of recent EU immigrants living in the UK.
The Conservative manifesto says:
“If (EU) jobseekers have not found a job within 6 months, they will be required to leave”.
This seems to be in direct conflict with Article 20 of the EU Treaty which gives EU citizens a right to
“move and reside freely within the territory of (other) member states”.
Furthermore, the manifesto recalls that the Government has already banned housing benefit for EU immigrants and continues:
“We will insist that EU migrants who want to claim tax credit and child benefit must have lived here for five years”.
This seems in flat contradiction of Article 45 of the EU Treaty which requires:
“the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers as regards employment, remuneration, and other conditions of employment”.
Tax credits are a form of negative income tax. If discrimination in respect of tax credits were to be permitted, it would become impossible, within the EU, to resist a proposal to apply different income tax rates, or different tax free allowances, to people of different EU nationalities.
Make your mind up Dave
The irony of the UK Government’s position is that they want a stronger Single Market, with greater freedom to sell goods and services, and move capital, across boundaries within the EU. But they wish to resist the freedom of movement of workers across EU boundaries! This will be seen by many in the rest of the EU as ideologically biased, as well as discriminatory.
Another knotty question, within the UK itself, will be the position of the devolved governments in Scotland , Northern Ireland and Wales.
For example, given their electoral support level, how can David Cameron exclude the Scottish Nationalists from the UK negotiating team? Offering to include them could be good politics. Excluding them from the negotiating team, if they requested a place, would make a Scottish exit from the UK more likely.
A UK demand is likely to be the repatriation of more powers from Brussels to the 28 member parliaments, including Westminster. The difficulty here is that a comprehensive “Competence Review” by the UK Foreign Office, across the whole range of EU powers, failed to come up with many concrete suggestions for powers that ought to be repatriated.
Completing the single market – yes or no?
The UK may also demand a “red card ” system, whereby EU laws, already approved in the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament – where the UK is well represented – could be derailed by vetos from a number of national parliaments. This would prolong and delay the already laborious process of EU law making.
It would also run directly counter to another UK demand, for completion of the EU Single market. For example, the outstanding matters of creating a Single market in Digital Services, in Energy, and in Capital for lending, all in the UK’s interests, require more new EU laws, not less.
The proposed “red card” would,be more likely to be used by other EU states to block things the UK wants than the other way around.
These difficulties all suggest that David Cameron should seek to reframe the entire negotiation, both in the way he presents it at home and in the rest of the EU.
Rather than looking for exceptions for the UK, he should emphasise Britain’s capacity to take the lead in the EU in clearing away barriers to economic growth across all of Europe, a stance that would play to his country’s strength and would put others on the back foot.
This is an edited version of a blog that first appeared in the Irish Independent and is reproduced here with the author’s permission.